Phone: 619-238-4900

Why AI and ChatGPT Will Not Replace Attorneys

AI and ChatGPT | Eve MazzarellaWith the surge in AI and ChatGPT technology, discussions around their potential and implications have dominated many professional circles. AI has already revolutionized sectors from healthcare to supply chain management, academia to economics. Within the legal field, AI services offer promising assistance, but will they ever replace attorneys? The simple answer is: not in the foreseeable future. Below Eve Mazzarella a Paralegal considers an in-depth look as to why.

In the interest of full disclosure and context, I’m part of Gen X. I had pager, remember Nintendo’s launch of the Gameboy, and our first home computer was primarily used for word processing and Pong. In fact, the first time I accessed the internet was in college. While embracing all the ways technology has made life easier, I, like many others, are acutely aware of the limitations of the digital world.

Navigating Legal Labyrinths: Legal work requires a nuanced understanding of laws, regulations, and precedents, and the capability to interpret them for specific cases. For instance, consider a patent infringement case. An attorney doesn’t just need to understand the law, they must consider the history of similar cases, the specific nuances of the patent in question, and the broader context of the industry. While AI can aid in research and discovery, it doesn’t yet fully grasp or interpret these nuances as effectively as a human lawyer.

The Crucial Role of Ethics and Judgment: The legal practice extends beyond understanding and applying laws. It also hinges on a strong ethical component and the ability to exercise judgment in ambiguous situations. For example, in a case involving an autonomous vehicle accident, a human attorney must weigh the responsibility of the software developer, the vehicle owner, and potentially the passenger. This ethical judgment, critical in complex litigation, is an area where AI still shows limitations.

Cultivating Relationships and Trust: An attorney’s role extends to building relationships with clients, understanding their unique needs, and gaining their trust. The attorney-client privilege and the duty of confidentiality help build this trust. Clients can openly share their concerns with their attorney, knowing that their secrets are safe. This level of empathy and understanding is an aspect that AI currently cannot replicate.

Creative Problem Solving and Negotiation: Legal work often requires creative problem-solving and effective negotiation. These skills often rely on understanding human emotion and social norms. Let’s consider a high-stakes business merger where negotiations are not just about the numbers but also about understanding the motivations and fears of the other party. An attorney can pick up on subtle cues, like body language or tone of voice, to steer the negotiation favorably – an area where AI falls short.

Adapting to Changing Laws and Regulations: Laws and regulations are ever-evolving, influenced by societal, political, and cultural changes. Take privacy laws in the digital age as an example. These have been quickly changing in response to new technology developments, and a human attorney can navigate these changes more effectively than an AI system programmed to adapt to new information.

AI’s Impact on Legal Work: While AI is unlikely to replace attorneys, it has started to revolutionize the way they work. AI can take over routine tasks, such as legal research and document review. For instance, AI can sift through thousands of documents in a fraction of the time it would take a human, making legal processes more efficient and allowing attorneys to focus on more complex and meaningful work.

The Legal Quandaries of AI: Interestingly, the development and use of AI in the legal field also raises its own legal and ethical questions. If an AI tool makes an error that leads to adverse legal consequences, who should be held responsible? Recently there has been some highly publicized criticism of the use of AI and, in some cases, restrictions and disclaimers have begun to be required by the courts. These complexities emphasize the continuing need for human legal expertise.

In conclusion, while AI is a powerful tool that can complement legal work, it is far from replacing the human attorneys who navigate the intricate, emotional, and ever-changing landscape of the law. The key for legal professionals is to stay adaptable and embrace these technological advancements, integrating them into their practice to provide the best service to their clients. Particularly in the world of litigation as opposed to transactional or other areas of law, AI provides the opportunity to streamline certain necessities of practice but is unlikely to replace human understanding in negotiating settlements, effective mediation, jury selection, or a number of other aspects of the profession. Simply put, emotional intelligence and professional judgment still have a critical role to play that AI cannot yet fill.

At Mazzarella Law APC we deal with complex business disputes, real estate litigation, diverse real property issues, and probate litigation – each of which requires an irreplaceable element of human understanding, empathy, and strategy. Not to mention, we love our clients and value the trust they place in us and the relationships formed through our work!

Written by Eve Mazzarella – Paralegal